Using Analytical Lab Instruments to Find Defects in Cans (Food Safety Tech)

Food Safety Tech
December 14, 2015
By Wayne D. Niemeyer

Learn more about using current technology to evaluate defects in cans: “Prevent Contamination from Defects in Metal Can Food Packaging”

Case 1

Dark stains were observed on the outer surfaces of ends on tin-plated steel food cans when the cans came out of the retort sterilization system. During gentle scraping with a needle, it was determined that the stains were deposits on the surface of the clear organic protective coating. Portions of the deposits were mounted for analysis by SEM/EDS and revealed a composition mainly of iron oxide with elevated levels of calcium, chlorine and silicon. Other minor and trace elements included sodium, magnesium, aluminum, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc. It was concluded that the residues were water salts and iron corrosion products, which would be consistent with retort water residue. Apparently the retort water was not sufficiently rinsed from the cans upon exiting the retort system. These deposits, being rather loosely adhered to the surface of the coating, could easily wash off into the product when the steel ends are opened with a circumferential can opener.

Case 2

Drawn & Ironed (D&I) tin plated steel food cans are formed in high-speed machines using an emulsified lubricant in the tooling. The cans then go through a cleaning process and as a final step in the process, a water-soluble organic coating, known as a wash coat, is put on the outside of the cans by a flow curtain application method. Numerous consumer complaints were received in which the internal protective coating on the cans was losing adhesion and depositing into the product brine. Examination of the interior sidewalls of sample cans revealed film-like stains near the top of the cans where the adhesion failure was occurring. FTIR analysis of the stains identified them as the wash coat. In this case, some of the wash coat had migrated into the inside of the cans by capillary action during the can washing process. The internal protective coating that was applied later in the can manufacturing operation was not compatible with the wash coat. Several corrective actions had to be taken, which included some modifications to the wash coat flow curtain system and reformulations of the wash coat and internal coatings to make them more compatible for adhesion.

Full Article Available